Category Newsletters

A guy I new 30 years ago came into my office yesterday and wanted to hear my views on “medical marijuana”. When I told him that “medical” means “commercial” and is regulated by congress, he nodded and said that is what he thought.

He said he had read both of my books on the website and that he thought they were “brilliant”, and that if I had written them myself, then that was very impressive to him. I told him that if he understood what I wrote, then that would put him into a level or group that very few people are in.

Then he stated a fact that I knew, but it still sent chills down my back and again revealed to me that there are VERY FEW people who are going to understand what freedom and liberty are, and that even fewer people are going to be able to take THE personal action that is necessary to defend one’s freedom and liberty.

He said, “Zeke, I’ve read them each more than three times and I find that I ‘get it’, and then after a day or two of being back in the ‘zombie’ world, and listening to the public media, I fall back into the ‘brainwash’ thinking.”

This reminded me of my own experience of having knowledge of the truth about the Constitution and Common Law, and seeing how the system doesn’t do what it is supposed to do. I new I was brainwashed, but it took me about 6 years to really overthrow the “status quo” concepts that I was brainwashed with from early childhood.

I am a rebel. I have an extremely strong mind and have studied the history of this country, the Constitution, and the Common Law. I have asked many “leaders” and people that are oriented towards “patriots”, but NO ONE seems to actually grasp or understand these principals that were founded by the framers of our country. I didn’t make up any of the points, just put them in a reasonable and logical format to make it easy to comprehend.

So, when my friend asked how many people “get it”, I told him “NO ONE!”

“What about your friends?” he asked, do they get it? I finally had to tell him, If you really want to get this stuff, you have to practice! Is anyone practicing? Anyone scared to go to court? Anyone have any time for this? Isn’t it easier to get an attorney?

For those who have been waiting, we are just about ready to open “the store” part of our website where we will have various past seminars that I have done over the years. We should have some great deals and a lot of knowledge available. Keep watching for this. Keep practicing.

One of our constitutional rights is the right to own, posses, and protect Property. The right to property or the ownership of property is evidenced by three things: 1) The Title, 2) The Right to Title, and 3) Possession. So basically, there are three aspects of ownership that create title.

Let’s look at the Title first. Title is a piece of paper that recites certain actions and agreements that states who has the “legal” right to the property. This Title is a document know generally as a “Deed”. There are all kinds of deeds, but it is the “Deed” that shows “prima facia” the owner of the property.

Read More

Unfortunately after waiting more than three years, the Liberty Dollar, actually the Liberty Dollar founder, Bernard von NotHaus went to trial and was found guilty by the government in a government court. Do I sound surprised? I’m not. It appears that the process is exactly the same for a traffic ticket. The prosecutor tells the jury the governments story and the jury buys it; hook, line, and sinker! Sometimes, if the case is difficult, the government will play dirty.

Of course Mr. Von NotHaus, does not have anywhere near the understanding or experience that I have in the courts, he thought (although he knew different) that he was going to get a fair trial. WRONG!

Read More

If you are looking past the rallies, voting, and rhetoric, you’ll find that the basic right that is guaranteed by the Constitution and the Common Law is “Due Process”.  It’s pointed out in the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.  Due process means notice and a fair hearing.  It makes sense that if you don’t get noticed and/or you are not getting “heard” in a fair manner, then it should be obvious you got no chance in h*ll at getting a just result.

A just result is what the framers wanted each of us to get every time we went to the government for an injury, injustice, or a wrong.  SO WHAT WENT WRONG?

Read More

I put a motion into the civil forfeiture case over a year ago, but I was never served with the order that the court issued. The other day I opened a Pacer account and was looking for what the court ordered in the “warrant” case (which I’ve been reporting here,) and I found the order of the court in the “forfeiture” case.

I found that the judge basically denied my motion for the same reason he denied my motion for an order to show cause because he thinks it is frivolous that I am requesting a hearing in the matter. These denials tell me that they do not wish to hear anything that I have to say or give me any remedy through the federal courts.

Read More

I said I would let everyone know about the progress of my little escapade regarding the “Liberty Dollar” in the federal court of North Carolina. I asked the Federal Court to reconsider my motion to quash and the Magistrate came back with “it is well settled law….”

Read More

As mentioned in the previous Liberty Dollar Update, the U.S Attorney alleged that I did not have “standing” to challenge the Seizure of the property. In the Order denying my motion, the Magistrate pointed out that I did claim an interest in the property, however he noticed that I did not say that I expected a privacy right at the location where the Warrants were served. I still haven’t figured out why he would interject a “privacy right” where no right was needed or available. He denied the motion with prejudice, which means no trying again on that, and he commented that he didn’t like my use of such “harsh words” when I gave my “opinion” of the officers investigation.

Although it appears that I have been precluded from proceeding in this particular matter and the Magistrate advises me to pay close attention to the Forfeiture and Criminal cases, I still have a few options that I believe may give a remedy. I’ll be working on this for the next couple weeks and will keep everyone posted with the results. It not over yet!

Back in November of 2007 the F.B.I. raided four locations belonging to the Liberty Dollar around the country and seized thousands of pounds of copper, thousands of ounces of silver, and many ounces of gold, plus a quarter million dollars in cash. The ‘feds’ then began a civil forfeiture action in 2008 and a criminal action in 2009. They proceeded to ‘bury’ the criminal defendants with 1.5 million documents to force the defense to waive the speedy trial rule and take many months to sift through the paperwork in order to create a defense.

On April 15, 2010 I sent into the federal court in North Carolina a motion to quash the four warrants that were issued against the Liberty Dollar back in November of 2007. The court unsealed the case and gave the United States ten (10) days to respond to my motion. Last Monday the attorney for the U.S. sent over his response requesting the court deny my motion. Thursday morning (4-28-10) the Court received my reply to the U.S.’s response and we are now waiting for the ruling. As soon as I hear, I will let everyone know.

When J.P. Morgan and his buddies were attempting to take control of the American Government during the late 1800’s they ran into a major problem. The Constitution was directly in their path to extend their power.

They had to take control of each branch of government separately and control them to their own ends. Congress and the Presidency were easy by way of controlling the voting or counting of votes. The Judicial Power was a tougher problem. This required precise cases set up to go to the Supreme Court and distinguish Constitutional law from Contract or Commercial law.

Read More

Constitutional rights are not civil rights. Constitutional rights are tried, heard, and defended at the “agency” or administrative level.

Civil rights violations are filed in a judicial court and not in the administrative court. The facts that constitute a “rights” violation must be determined at the administrative level before any court of law may take jurisdiction. There must be a set of facts that are sufficient to constitute a violation of one’s rights and the agent’s supervisor or commissioner must agree that those facts occurred or failed to occur before a case can be heard or continued in a Judicial Court.

Read More