Welcome to Power Politics!
In 1997 we started this site in an effort to help people learn about the legal process so they could help themselves solve the problems they were running into in the Courts.
We found that most people don’t care and of those who do, very few are willing to put in the time and energy to understand how to wield the Judicial Power of the Constitution as envisioned by some of the forefathers of this great nation.
So, if you want to put forth the effort, get technical, read a lot, study, and learn to assert and defend your rights, then you can begin your journey to Sovereignty by learning about the three Powers that were established and delegated by the Constitution.
Some may think there is another way that would be easier, like hiring an attorney. If you haven’t already experienced this phenomenon, it shouldn’t take you long to figure it out. Just about the time you run out of money, it dawns on you, these guys are sharks.
Others might think they can use “canned” answers that are devised by “experts” and somehow the judge or magistrate will do the “right thing” and rule in their favor… This is wishful thinking.
To obtain or sustain Liberty is a battle. The price is eternal vigilance. No one can do it for you! No corporation can do it for you. You must take responsibility for your own liberty. It’s time to learn a new game of Political Power and learn the true definitions of words…
Power Politics is the the people taking control of their lives and government, calling for honest money, a return to Constitutional Law, and exercising Judicial Power… in court.
The exercise of Judicial Power is a personal action that challenges the authority of the executive power (the judge) to administer legislation upon the individual, and must be pled In Propria persona.
This concept is new to the 21st century legal theories and is an exercise of power by the individual, which has been unheard of for over 100 years.
Power Politics is a nonpartisan activity that can only be done by the individual. It is the revelation that the individual has more power than the group when it comes to exercising political power. Political power is “paramount control of the Constitution and its frame of government”. This is known as “sovereignty.”
This concept is a way of thinking, and the individual is encouraged to learn the basic theory and understand the fundamentals good enough to go into the proper arena to effect a remedy that one can accept as a reasonable and fair conclusion. This is brought about through “good faith” by all parties concerned.
Power comes from the knowledge of the truth. What is the Truth? The way to find the truth is through personal investigation of the facts to conclude the proper application of the law.
Our national Constitution, or frame of government, defines the boundaries and limits of power, that all groups and individuals have agreed to proceed by.
Learning and understanding the game of “Power Politics” is the road to freedom and redemption. This process manifests the double edged sword that is provided by the Constitution.
The perspective behind Power Politics is that “party politics” draws away from the individual and his understanding of the political process thereby encouraging lack of responsibility for one’s own actions. Power Politics is “Personal Political Power.”
All political power is inherent in the people.
Political Power can be exercised by voting for representatives to take up space in the legislative or executive branches of government… and, it may also be exercised by personal action taken through the Judicial branch of government by conducting the “One Supreme Court”. This is done by exercising sovereignty or controlling the “due process” and “equal protection of the laws” guaranteed by the Constitution.
A government of the people (Legislative), by the people (Executive) and for the people (Judicial).
The concept that makes the united states Constitution the most powerful document of modern times is the fact that it created a government that had three separate powers (kings) as opposed to the usual one. These three powers were vigorously debated over by the framers with the object of allowing them to be exercised, not only by government legislators and executors, but also by the people themselves.
By vesting power in the “One” Supreme Court of the judicial branch of government in 1787, the framers gave to the people and the posterity the opportunity to exercise sovereignty if they could understand the process of their own government. Note that the Powers of the legislative and executive branches are vested in those elected and not a forum, or arena available to all.
The judicial Power was also vested in “inferior courts” that Congress from time to time could ordain and establish. This concept is very important because two years after the creation of the “One” Supreme Court Congress established an inferior court, called the “Supreme Court”, in the 1789 Judiciary Act. This court was to be under the control of the Chief Justice who was to be appointed by the President (ie. executive branch).
The operation of this “inferior” court was so prevalent by the legislators, executors, and their agents, that the people with the help of elected officials forgot about their “One” Supreme Court and allowed the legislative “Supreme Court” to usurp their Power. Confusion has always been the way of deception.
WHO ARE YOU?
The Constitution is the government. The frame of government for the United States is based on the creation of the three powers that were designated separate but equal. A careful analysis of the foundation of our state constitution (California) shows that each individual has standing to operate the Judicial Power as the Chief Justice.
Each individual must exercise the Judicial power using the position of the Chief Justice as described in the California Constitution, or be “subject” to the Legislative and Executive power.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 6 JUDICIAL
SEC. 1. The judicial power of this State is vested in the Supreme Court, courts of appeal, superior courts, and municipal courts. All courts are courts of record.
SEC. 2. The Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of California and 6 associate justices. The Chief Justice may convene the court at any time. Concurrence of 4 judges present at the argument is necessary for a judgment.
An acting Chief Justice shall perform all functions of the Chief Justice when the Chief Justice is absent or unable to act. The Chief Justice or, if the Chief Justice fails to do so, the court shall select an associate justice as acting Chief Justice.
There are no shortcuts to this understanding. Not only must one know the law and the process of law, but the fact that many words have been redefined just for the purpose of the legal profession, and to manipulate the masses through mind control.
GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS
“We the people in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, …and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity…establish this constitution for the united states of America”.
Let’s start with the “people” and the individual. If the individual acts as one of the “people”, then he is no longer an individual. Being a member of any political party is relinquishing power, legally, by “registration” (joining the group).
The powers of the Legislative and Executive branches are granted to those who are elected (people) but the power of the Judicial Branch of Government is vested in The One Supreme Court (person) (article III of US constitution 1787 and Article VI of the California State Constitution). Congress convened the Supreme Court 2 years later in the 1789 Judiciary Act.
No matter how you perceive it, the courts recognize that there are two types of persons under the law. Corporeal (body) and incorporeal (without body). The incorporeal person is known as a legal fiction (group). A legal fiction has certain rights under the law, but all fictions are unable to speak and therefore must be represented by an agent (associate justice?).
When an agent (police officer) characterizes the style of one’s name in all uppercase letters, it is an indication (rebuttable presumption) that the person is a legal fiction or incorporeal and thus “subject to” the regulation or laws for the legal (legislative) fictions, i.e. police power.
IF AN INDIVIDUAL USES THE ARGUMENT THAT BECAUSE HIS NAME IS IN UPPERCASE LETTERS, THE COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION, THE COURT WILL PROCEED AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL TO HIS DETRIMENT.
It should be noted that all the arguments regarding the gold fringed flag, nome de gerre, possession of drivers license, UCC, etc. are only indications that one is volunteering to be prosecuted, it is not the reason why one is being prosecuted. An individual can only be prosecuted if he/she volunteers to be prosecuted. Arguing any one of the elements that appear to give the court jurisdiction, will give the court jurisdiction.
Is it possible that the judicial power was reserved for each individual to act as the Chief Justice and we give this power up to an associate justice (judge or magistrate) if we are absent or unable (fail) to act?
AGREE WITH YOUR ADVERSARY
The interaction between the officer (government/state agent) and the “subject” (individual) is a policy hearing, in fact, and is held under the executive branch or “police power”.
The invitation or “notice to appear”, that is issued by the agent is “presumptive” in nature in that it identifies the individual as a “subject”, which is agreed upon if one fails (to act) to rebut the agent’s presumptive claim.
The police powers are grounded in the 14th amendment and the guarantee of “Due Process and Equal Protection of the laws”. Paramount to the agencies and their agents is a sense of reasonableness, fairness, and good faith.
It just so happens that we, the posterity are also bound by the same “due process” rules of reasonableness, fairness, and good faith while exercising the judicial power, and therefore we are in agreement with the executive branch upon these fundamental concepts and principles. This is why we must assert “due process”.
All courts have limited power to hear cases of a certain subject matter and limited power to bind parties (persons) to issues it might otherwise try. In Civil matters the parties are bound to the court by service of summons. In Criminal matters the warrant or arrest binds the defendant, and in quasi-criminal, the ticket (notice to appear) is both the summons and complaint (short form) and the defendant proceeds voluntarily [sic].
When the Government is moving against one of it’s people, because they are proceeding in a Statutory jurisdiction, the action is one in the nature of “special proceeding” and not technically civil or criminal. This is where the Writ is the remedy, because the special proceeding to review the statutory authority is a special proceeding at Common Law.
Obtaining the remedy is somewhat like playing an instrument. It takes study of the theory, leaning basic fundamentals, and practice, practice, practice.