Dr. Livingston Audio (~2 hours.)

I found that the judge basically denied my motion for the same reason he denied my motion for an order to show cause because he thinks it is frivolous that I am requesting a hearing in the matter. These denials tell me that they do not wish to hear anything that I have to say or give me any remedy through the federal courts.

My conclusion is that I have no remedy in the federal court, which makes sense if one views the Constitution as a separate court from the federal or appellate authority. Instead, remedy should lie in the judicial power, which is the Article III Court designated in the Constitution.

It's becoming clear that maybe I should inform the people at the Liberty Dollar about my little "investigation by filing", because they may be able to learn some things from the orders the judge has written in regard to my motions. I'll keep you posted.

I decided, due to the situation in this particular case, that I would take a totally different approach to getting heard. I have already began the process, but it may take a little time since I'm not an expert in this kind of stuff.... at least not self-appointed.

I think the main point to remember here is that I'm basically trying to get a hearing which I believe I have a right to (see the Fifth Amendment). At this point it doesn't matter if I can win the case or not, but I won't be able to find out unless I get a hearing. So we are boiling this process down to the Right to he heard. That Right is in the First Amendment where it says, "... to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Most people misunderstand the 'petition' process, and think that it goes to Congress or the federal government, when this is the general idea, the specific process of 'petition' for purposes of obtaining a remedy, is "a formal application to a court requesting judicial action on a certain matter." If you read the next paragraph for the definition of petition in Black's Law, you just might come to the realization that this process may very well be the remedy we have been looking for all this time.

Although it appears that I have been precluded from proceeding in this particular matter and the Magistrate advises me to pay close attention to the Forfeiture and Criminal cases, I still have a few options that I believe may give a remedy. I'll be working on this for the next couple weeks and will keep everyone posted with the results. It not over yet!

On April 15, 2010 I sent into the federal court in North Carolina a motion to quash the four warrants that were issued against the Liberty Dollar back in November of 2007. The court unsealed the case and gave the United States ten (10) days to respond to my motion. Last Monday the attorney for the U.S. sent over his response requesting the court deny my motion. Thursday morning (4-28-10) the Court received my reply to the U.S.'s response and we are now waiting for the ruling. As soon as I hear, I will let everyone know.

They had to take control of each branch of government separately and control them to their own ends. Congress and the Presidency were easy by way of controlling the voting or counting of votes. The Judicial Power was a tougher problem. This required precise cases set up to go to the Supreme Court and distinguish Constitutional law from Contract or Commercial law.

Civil rights violations are filed in a judicial court and not in the administrative court. The facts that constitute a "rights" violation must be determined at the administrative level before any court of law may take jurisdiction. There must be a set of facts that are sufficient to constitute a violation of one's rights and the agent's supervisor or commissioner must agree that those facts occurred or failed to occur before a case can be heard or continued in a Judicial Court.

This is said not to just call them liars, it's to make you aware that they are out to mislead you and that they do not have your best interest in mind.

If you feel government has anything to offer; jobs, healthcare, or any good or service that will benefit you, then you do not understand what I mean when I say that they are liars.

We are testing a new newsletter program and I'm going to be writing a little more often as it appears that people are having great difficulties due to the lack of information readily available.

For example: Joe Stack, who flew a plane into the IRS building in Texas. He just didn't have the knowledge of how to deal with his "relationship" with the IRS.

Whenever two parties have a dispute, they are in a relationship. The legal system sets the rules of the relationship so that disputes or issues can be resolved in a "fair and just" manner. This is known as "due process" and applies both broadly and specifically as to each individual case.